Skip to main content

The last decade has seen rapid progress in the field of machine learning and neural networking. Using these techniques, computers now routinely recognise images, parse and respond to human speech, answer questions and make decisions. Welcome to the early robot future.

There is a wide range of views about how urgent or profound the policy questions raised by general, "human level", artificial intelligence may be. But regardless of whether you think general purpose AI is imminent or still in the distant future, there are some topics raised by the state of the art in neural networking and machine learning algorithms that need to be addressed in the short term. For instance:

  • What rules, if any, should constrain the use of machine learning methods when coupled to the large scale surveillance technologies operated by intelligence agencies? What about the large datasets collected by private tech companies?
  • When algorithms, including AI and machine learning systems, make decisions that affect human lives, from the mundane (e.g. price discrimination) to the profound (e.g. sentencing recommendations), what standards of transparency, openness and accountability should apply to those decisions? If the decisions are "wrong", who is legally and ethically responsible?
  • How do we prevent machine learning systems from producing racially biased results, or from engaging in other problematic forms of "profiling"?

EFF is tracking these issues, and will intervene to ensure there are protections against the privacy, safety and due process problems that could be caused by poorly designed or deployed machine learning systems, while protecting the rights of innovators to build, experiment with and deploy awesome new forms of AI.

Artificial Intelligence Highlights

Artificial Intelligence Updates

4 volume controls for fair use on purple background

Search Engines, AI, And The Long Fight Over Fair Use

Long before generative AI, copyright holders warned that new technologies for reading and analyzing information would destroy creativity. Internet search engines, they argued, were infringement machines—tools that copied copyrighted works at scale without permission. As they had with earlier information technologies like the photocopier and the VCR, copyright owners sued.
Copyright Static

Copyright Kills Competition

Copyright owners increasingly claim more draconian copyright law and policy will fight back against big tech companies. In reality, copyright gives the most powerful companies even more control over creators and competitors. Today’s copyright policy concentrates power among a handful of corporate gatekeepers—at everyone else’s expense. We need a system...

Pages

Back to top

JavaScript license information